Hundreds of Ukrainians rallied in Kyiv and other cities this week after President Volodymyr Zelenskyy dismissed Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, a popular figure widely credited with modernising the military and slowing Russia's advance.

The unexpected sacking ignited public anger, with civil society groups and military personnel expressing deep concern over the removal of a minister seen as crucial to the nation's defence efforts. This political upheaval comes as the Ukrainian parliament also elected Serhii Koretskyi as the country's new prime minister, according to reports from Al Jazeera.

President Zelenskyy defended his decision to The Guardian, stating he had to choose “one side or the other” following a reported breakdown in relations between the defence ministry and military leaders. However, the BBC noted that the president offered no further detailed explanation for Fedorov's sudden removal.

Mykhailo Fedorov had gained significant popularity for implementing critical reforms and improving logistical capabilities within the armed forces since Russia’s full-scale invasion. His departure raises immediate questions about the stability of Ukraine's war leadership during a critical period.

Demonstrators gathered in central Kyiv, with Euronews reporting hundreds present, voicing their discontent over the perceived disruption to the war effort. Similar, smaller demonstrations were reported across other Ukrainian cities.

Kyiv protest street crowd

Fedorov's role was particularly vital in integrating Western military assistance and streamlining operations, earning him a reputation as a key moderniser. His dismissal marks a significant shift in Ukraine’s government structure.

The political shake-up comes as Ukraine continues to battle Russian aggression, relying heavily on military and financial support from Western allies. Any perceived instability in Kyiv's leadership could complicate future aid packages and strategic planning with international partners.

The long-term implications for Ukraine's defence strategy and the ongoing conflict under new leadership remain under close scrutiny by both domestic and international observers.